Automation
Human-in-the-loop is a design decision, not a fallback
Adding a human reviewer to every step is how automation projects quietly become slower than the manual process they replaced.
6 min read
Review by consequence, not by step
Route work by the cost of being wrong. Low-consequence outputs pass through with sampling. High-consequence outputs get a named reviewer and a deadline.
Make the review fast to perform
A reviewer should be able to accept, edit, or reject in under fifteen seconds. If the interface requires reading the source material from scratch, you have not automated anything.
- Diff-style presentation with sources inline
- Keyboard-first accept and reject
- Rejections feed the next tuning cycle
Want this applied to your business?
Our forward deployed engineers embed with your team and ship working AI in weeks.
Start a project